Samantha Kittle serves as Expert inFederal Trial involving Tax Evasion

Samantha Kittle, CPA, partner, recently served as expert witness in a 13-day trial involving multiple felonies, including tax evasion, failure to pay payroll taxes, and failure to file a tax return.   The defendant, a disbarred lawyer, was investigated by Homeland Security Investigations, IRS Criminal Investigation and the FBI.  Other felony charges included multiple counts of wire fraud involving millions of dollars of misappropriated client settlements.

The defendant in this Criminal Justice Act (CJA) matter was represented by Anthony M. Solis, A Professional Law Corporation and the Law Office of Steven Brody.   The trial was held in U.S. District Court, Central District before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald.

Matters Handled

Ms. Kittle is available for additional cases, including federal tax evasion and conspiracy; partnership disputes; embezzlement; breach of contract; civil and criminal tax proceedings; and bank secrecy, structuring, and form 8300 violations. She represents clients during both civil audits and criminal investigations under Kovel agreements with attorneys.

Samantha is a partner in Howard, Kittle and Company CPAs.  Samantha’s partner is Gary L. Howard, CPA, a nationally-recognized forensic accountant.  With over 35 years of experience working with tax controversy and white collar crime issues, he is recognized as one of the top CPAs in the area serving clients in such matters.

Howard, Kittle and Company professionals have extensive trial experience, resulting in multiple acquittals and reduced charges for a wide array of criminal defense matters.

Samantha Kittle, CPASamantha Kittle, CPA

Samantha is a partner at Howard, Kittle and Company CPAs, LLP. She manages the accounting staff, overseeing all facets of each tax and accounting engagement, as well as working extensively in litigation support and tax controversy engagements. Samantha earned her M.S. in Taxation from Golden Gate University.

The Best Defense is a Good Offense: Trust Accounting

Gina Lara

{Editor’s note: Gina Lara, Senior Manager, Tax and Forensics, recently published an article in the Orange County Business Journal discussing key trust accounting items that estate planning/probate attorneys and trustees need to be aware of.  Below is an excerpt.}

Trustees who are not presently seeking court approval have flexibility in the format of their trust accounting, but they still must meet certain substance requirements. Accounting in the probate code format is the best way to ensure these requirements are met and adequate disclosure has been made to all beneficiaries …

The cost of an accounting prepared in probate code format is an administrative expense of the trust. It is immaterial in comparison to the cost of defending oneself in court for failure to adequately deliver timely accountings of trust money to beneficiaries. When it comes to trust accounting, the best defense is a good offense by filing proper fiduciary accountings each year.

Please read the article, then contact Smith Dickson if you have any questions.

Estate Planning for Beneficiaries with Addictions

argument over drugs

Estate Planning for
Beneficiaries with Addictions

Recovery from addiction can be a lifelong process – so how to handle this in your estate plan?

Is this your dilemma?

Your beneficiary suffers from addiction (e.g., drugs, alcohol, gambling, shopping, eating, sex, etc.).  He/she may not fully acknowledge it and likely believes that the impact is far less than the reality, which you can clearly see. As part of your estate plan, you want to ensure that this loved one is cared for in the event of your passing.

Your concern is that an inheritance of cash or other assets can make the problem even worse.  However, disinheriting the person doesn’t allow access to funds necessary for recovery.  You’ve thought of doing a trust but aren’t sure how to structure it, much less finding the right person to burden with administration.  What do you do?

What are typical options?

  • Lump sum cash inheritance: An addict’s decision-making can be impaired and irrational, so having a large inheritance can prove disastrous, actually contributing to an unhealthy lifestyle, relapse, or bad relationships that feed off the inheritance.
  • Disinheritance: While often discussed, this strategy can lead to hurt, shame, further addiction, and alienation from other family members.
  • Establishing a trust: Holding the inheritance in a trust, managed by a responsible trust, can be the best option. A trust can be used as a safety net while protecting assets from immediate access by an addicted beneficiary, as well as from creditors.

Recovery from an addiction is likely a lifelong healing process for your loved one.  Further, as a disease, relapse from addiction is common, so remember that your long-term goals are likely to protect your loved one and to foster recovery.

How to select a trustee?

Managing a trust for an addicted person can be extremely difficult, both in time expenditure and the emotional toll.  As such, careful consideration should be given to trustee selection.  If financial resources allow, consider a professional fiduciary. It is easier for a third-party to make rational decisions, and he/she will is less likely to be unaffected by an addict’s manipulative or otherwise bad behavior. While family members may offer emotional and moral support, their history of dealing with the addict may affect them and hinder effective decision-making if selected as trustee. 

How should the trust be structured?

There are numerous questions to be addressed with your estate planning attorney in designing the correct structure for your situation.  Here are a few:

  • Timeframe: An ongoing trust may last for years, up to the entire lifetime(s) of your beneficiaries. It may be terminated upon full rehabilitation, death, or if the trust is no longer feasible to maintain.
  • What financial needs should the trust cover? Many trusts include provisions for basic needs, such as medical care, food and shelter. The trust might also provide for rehabilitation, counseling, and other forms of treatment. In some situations, no distributions are made to a beneficiary while an addict.
  • Who controls the funds? Usually, the trustee controls distribution of funds to creditors, rather than handing funds directly to the beneficiary. This can be a time-consuming activity and is another reason why a professional fiduciary trustee should be considered. Also, incentives can be provided to motivate the beneficiary to seek treatment or meet other “life skills” goals. 

Other considerations?

Since every situation is unique, discuss your needs with a qualified estate planning attorney.  In addition to the above, the attorney might discuss factors such as:

  • Should the trust be established while you are living or take effect upon your death?
  • How to explain the trust to the addict?
  • How can the trust be designed to not interfere with the beneficiary’s eligibility for government benefits?
  • How would the trustee evaluate a beneficiary’s addiction?
  • What control does the family have when a third-party acts as trustee?
  • Should there be both a trust advisor and a trust protector? 

Obtaining Professional Guidance

Addictive behavior can impact every aspect of life, not just of the addict but those who love him or her the most.  Our attorneys have extensive experience in estate planning involving beneficiaries with addictions.  Please contact Mortensen & Reinheimer, PC at (714) 384-6053 or use our online contact form. Our website is http://www.ocestateplanning.net.

Weily-Yang_150x134About the author:
Weily Yang is an attorney at Mortensen & Reinheimer, PC, an estate planning and probate law corporation in Irvine. Weily is a zealous advocate for individuals with special needs. His primary focus is special needs trusts and probate conservatorships together with estate planning, trust administration, and probate. He can be reached at weily@ocestateplanning.net.