Estate Planning for Vacation Homes
(Note: This article is general in nature and is geared towards California properties. Seek professional legal and accounting advice before making any decisions.)
For generations, vacation homes have been cherished by family members. Since this property is quite often intended to pass on to the next generation, it might not be viewed as a wealth generator but simply has a family heirloom. If fact, many vacation homes generate negative cash flow, even on a tax basis. So, financially, vacation homes are typically thought of as a luxury asset whose primary value is enjoyment.
Importantly, in terms of estate planning, the property tax considerations of vacation homes have changed dramatically with the passage of Prop 19. This law has potentially severe financial consequences for children who inherit real property from their parents, because it considerably limits the availability of the parent-child exclusion for purposes of real estate tax assessments and resulting property-taxation.
Before and After Prop 19
Prior to Prop. 19, which took effect in 2021, parents could transfer a vacation property with up to $1 million of the assessed value being exempt from the increase in property taxes. This was regardless of the property’s use by the children. Now, under Prop 19, when a vacation home is inherited, it is reassessed at its current market value, which can lead to a significant increase in property taxes.
This can make it very difficult for children to keep these properties: the property might be running at a loss anyway (unless heavily rented), so the additional expense of increased property taxes might just be enough to force the sale of the property. This is especially sad for cherished family vacation homes that hold great memories and were hopefully going to be used for generations to come.
For example, if the parents purchased a vacation home in 2000 for $350,000, and the value of the rental property is more than $1 million when it is transferred upon the parents’ death to a child, the parents’ tax basis doesn’t pass on to the child. Since the child will now have to pay greatly increased property taxes based on the assessed fair market value, it can negatively impact the child’s decision to keep or sell.
It is important to note that from a capital gains tax perspective, current law still is unchanged by Prop 19. Estates of decedents who die during 2025 have a basic exclusion amount of $13,990,000, which generally means no capital gains will be applied if the estate is less than that amount. If the home is sold, capital gains taxes are only due on any gains made since it was inherited.
Potential Strategies
Given the impact of Prop. 19., there are several strategies to evaluate with your estate planning attorney, so that your estate plan can be optimally structured to meet your personal goals. Here are a few:
- Sell your current home and move into the vacation home – This could make sense if, among other reasons, you find yourself spending a greater percentage of time at your vacation home and would actually prefer living there during retirement. Also, an analysis could show that your vacation property might be better suited to avoid any increase in taxes to heirs because it fits within the parameters of Prop 19’s exemption for primary residences (i.e., difference between assessed value and market value is less than $1 million, so no reassessment). On top of these considerations, in order for your child to take advantage of your property taxes (i.e., the primary residence exemption allowed under Prop 19’s Intergenerational Transfer Exclusion), your child would need to occupy the home as their primary residence within one year of inheritance.
- Keep your current home as a rental and move into the vacation home as your primary residence. Logistically this might be difficult, and from a tax perspective it involves some layers of complications. For example, you can’t move back and forth frequently, claiming each as a primary residence. And selling can be complicated; if you eventually sell your second home, it is important to understand the taxable exclusion of $250,000 ($500,000 if married filing jointly) in gains from sales of primary residences, including treating your vacation home as a primary residence for at least two of the last five years prior to selling. (You might ask, “Can you have two residences in California?” The answer is no – an individual may only claim one domicile at a time.)
- Sell the property. This might happen in any case, if heirs would rather have the cash (which might be excluded from capital gains). Further it might be the only viable option if heirs cannot afford any significant negative cash flow.
- Keep it and pay the higher property taxes. As mentioned, this might not be a viable solution for many situations. But if your heirs have significant assets and cash flow, it might be doable.
- Convert it to an LLC. The rules applicable to LLCs under the California Revenue & Taxation Code can provide a potential loophole for avoiding higher property taxes. However, the implementation of this strategy depends on when the property was acquired, appreciation, ownership structure of the LLC, rent control, and numerous other factors and rules that might apply.
Experts in Estate Planning for Real Estate
At Mortensen & Reinheimer, PC we’ve crafted estate plans that have involved literally thousands of real estate properties! Let us put that experience to work for you in simplifying what can be a very complex process. We look forward to helping you! Please contact Mortensen & Reinheimer, PC at (714) 384-6053 to make an appointment, or use our online contact form. Our website is http://www.ocestateplanning.net.
About the author:
Tamsen R. Reinheimer, Attorney, is a Certified Specialist in Estate Planning, Trust & Probate Law (The State Bar of California Board of Legal Specialization). She has significant experience in all aspects of estate planning, trust administration, and probate. Contact Tamsen at tamsen@ocestateplanning.net.